[Communication] The value of a work determines whether it can be on Google.Author: JEFFI CHAO HUI WU Time: Thursday, July 17, 2025, 2:25 PM ········································ [Communication] The value of a work determines whether it can be on Google. ——It's not that your skills are good, but that what you write is worth keeping. I once thought that to have an article indexed by Google search engine, one needed SEO skills, backend promotion, keyword placement, sitemaps, external link structures... However, starting from June 2025, I continuously published original articles on an old, unoptimized phpBB forum system, and the results completely shattered all these technical myths. No optimization, no plugins, no submissions, no SEO. The result is: the vast majority of articles are indexed by Google within 20 hours of publication, with some even appearing directly on the homepage, accurately presenting the title and content paragraphs. So the question changed. From "How to get works on Google" — It has become a more fundamental question: Is your article worth being recorded? 1. The title is the first judgment point of the content. Google is not human; it won't take the time to slowly ponder your meaning. It only looks at whether you write clearly and speak plainly. The title is the signal. If the signal is unclear, the system won't pay attention at all. Whether an article is worth being included is often determined by the title. You must make it "understand what you want to say"; this is not rhetoric, but structural semiotics. II. The beginning must "capture the system" The beginning you write for others is also the first entry point for search systems to assess the value of the content. Many people start by going in circles, expressing emotions, providing background, and quoting others, resulting in the system missing the key points and skipping over the entire article. At the beginning of each of my articles, I clearly state: what I am talking about, on what basis, and what step I aim to reach. The system understands, only then will it be willing to keep you. Three, structure is a hundred times more important than you think. Google's semantic analysis is no longer the kind of keyword stuffing judgment from the past; it recognizes the logical flow and structural completeness of your entire article. Do you have a clear introduction, development, transition, and conclusion? Does each paragraph advance the argument? Does it revolve around the main theme? Is there a density of information? I follow the structure of "phenomenon - analysis - verification - reasoning - summary" in each of my articles. This structure is not meant to "look good," but to allow the system to understand and classify it as a **"indexable structure."** IV. Clean language, concise sentence structure, and high information density. What Google’s search system dislikes the most are hollow and lengthy texts, meaningless exclamatory sentences, and repetitive drivel. You write "So shocking" "Things you absolutely wouldn't expect"… sentences like these will be skipped directly. I never engage in "clickbait" or pile on "emotional words"; instead, I advance with every sentence, ensuring information is coherent and the language has structure. The system naturally judges it as high-quality text. V. The content must be original and possess "usability for others." Not every experience you have personally is necessarily valuable. The system only looks at whether you have produced something that others can take away. • A New Perspective • A methodology • A verifiable path I never write articles that "only move myself." Every piece I write revolves around a question that I dissect and answer: will others gain something from reading this? Only what is valuable is worth including. VI. The platform must be trustworthy, and the path must be stable. The phpBB forum system I use is very old, with no search optimization, but due to its long running time, clear structure, and extensive historical indexing, the system trusts it. Search engines are unlikely to take risks on "newly emerged temporary websites," nor will they favor platforms with chaotic paths and frequently changing structures. The trustworthiness of platforms beyond the content is also a fundamental layer of screening. VII. SEO is just a ticket to entry; value is the condition for winning. Many people think SEO is a cheat code, but I never do SEO, never study keywords, backlinks, or push structures. I only do one thing: write content that is worth keeping. The fact has been proven time and again: I defeated those who rely on optimization with content. They have solid techniques, but their articles are hollow; I have not optimized, but my words have power—thus I was included, and they were overlooked. More importantly: If everyone's SEO is done well, how does Google choose? It will definitely return to the content itself, re-comparing each piece: Whoever writes logically, whoever expresses more clearly, whoever outputs truly useful information. 8. I don't rely on packaging; I rely on the strength of my work. Many people rely on technical packaging, using wordplay, formatting styles, and system optimization to cover up the inherent thinness of the content itself. As for me, I rely on structure, content, thinking, and expressiveness. ✅ The essence of SEO is to create exquisite packaging for mediocre works. ✅ And my work doesn't need packaging. I do not rely on connections, loopholes in the rules, or gray optimization methods. I rely on only one thing: to make the words themselves worthy of being recorded. Nine, it's not that I am strong, but this system can recognize who is strong. I did not spend money on promotion, nor do I rely on any commercial means to manipulate search results. Why does Google actively index me? Sometimes it even indexes within a few hours? Because it is becoming more like a judgment system, rather than just a retrieval system. It doesn't look at what "nice words" you said; it looks at whether you have truly engaged in dialogue, said something useful, and shared words worth recording. Conclusion: If you write worthily, the world will come to seek you out. This article is not written for SEO enthusiasts, nor is it written for those who want to "boost their popularity." It is written for those who write seriously. Those who believe that "the written content can really change some people." Those who do not want to rely on promotion, but want to rely on their strength to reach the homepage. If you are also this kind of person, then you must understand: Google does not favor anyone. It only pets— ✅ A valuable piece of writing! Source: https://www.australianwinner.com/AuWinner/viewtopic.php?t=696900 |